🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to find the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.